hamptons local events, express news group

Story - News

Sep 15, 2019 6:21 PMPublication: The Southampton Press

Board Critical to Changes Made in Sag Harbor Cinema Project

Flashing installed at the Sag Harbor Cinema on Main Street drew harsh words from the Sag Harbor Village Historic Preservation & Architectural Review Board last week. Peter Boody
Sep 18, 2019 8:59 AM

The architect of the Sag Harbor Cinema Arts Center, which has been under construction for more than a year at 90 Main Street, got a tongue-lashing from a member of the village’s Historic Preservation and Architectural Review Board last week for making changes “on the fly” without the board’s approval.

A key problem was what the board’s chairman, Dean Gomolka, called a “mansard roof” element between the second and third floors that recently appeared on the western and southern sides at the rear of the building, under a set of third-floor windows.

“This change got made with no one thinking. It’s rush, rush, rush,” David Berridge, an architect himself, told the project architect, Allen Kopelson, at the HPARB’s September 12 meeting.

The 45-degree-angled roof hides what Mr. Kopelson called reinforcing “kickers” that had to be installed to support the third-floor wall under the windows. The kickers were “the most expedient way to resolve” the problem, he said, after the project’s structural engineer told him that “you can’t do this with the structure that you have.”

Mr. Gomolka noted that it’s a problem “to skip our process” for reviewing and approving architectural details in the village’s historic district, as required by the village code.

The board initially approved the Cinema Arts Center design in early 2018 but approved a revised proposal for an expanded third floor early this year, months after construction had begun.

“It’s so obvious” that “the construction manager is just making changes on site to suit him,” Mr. Berridge told Mr. Kopelson. “It’s just another example of being lazy and saying we are holding you up. This building is so important to Sag Harbor … These on-the-fly changes are doing the cinema a disservice.”

He added that a shiny, white coping that caps the parapet around the second-floor wall makes “this look like a mid-island cineplex.” He called it “the cheapest, ugliest flashing.”

Mr. Berridge also questioned plans for a proposed “green screen” of vegetation to hide some of the mass of the large rear walls. Mr. Kopelson said landscape architect Edmund Hollander has said the vegetation will climb directly on the walls — which Mr. Berridge said he doubted.

“This is not what we approved,” Mr. Berridge said, expressing further irritation that “we’re told, ‘You’re slowing us down,’” by making an issue of it.

Board members and some citizens raised questions about the “mansard roof” and the coping with Building Inspector Tom Prieato, who urged the Sag Harbor Partnership, the project’s sponsor, to go back to the board for approval. Mr. Berridge said the cinema project had prompted “lots of phone calls” and “backlash from the public.”

“I think it’s sad,” said board member Judith Long. “It’s getting bigger and bigger. It’s not our old cinema.”

The Sag Harbor Partnership was in negotiations to the buy the cinema, which was severely damaged in a fire on December 16, 2016, even before the fire, and closed on the purchase early in 2017. Through 2018, it appeared before local boards seeking approval for the creation of a three-screen, three-story cinema arts center.

Asked for a comment on the proceedings before the HPARB last week, the cinema’s public relations firm released this official statement on September 13: “Our engineer let us know that we needed additional bracing. Our architect came up with a solution, and the ARB asked for a resubmission. We are currently looking into other structural solutions that keep us on track for our scheduled opening.”

On the HPARB’s agenda for September 12, the partnership is listed as the applicant requesting a “certificate of appropriateness” for “the proposed addition of a metal roof section added due to structural requirements.”

From the start of the discussion, Mr. Gomolka advised Mr. Kopelson the application eventually would have to be aired at a public hearing according to the village code because it involves a structure covering more than 3,000 square feet in the historic district.

Meanwhile, he asked Mr. Kopelson to return for further discussion at the board’s next meeting on September 26 with a letter from the project engineer verifying for the need to solve a structural problem and a more thorough presentation of the options for addressing it.

You've read 1 of 7 free articles this month.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

Still for the life of me trying to figure how this project has gotten so big,,, added another story to make it 3 stories high......... what ever happened to the old Sag Harbor... look around at the houses in the village and they buy them knock them down and build bigger ones on the properties................
By RayCard (11), Sag Harbor, New York on Sep 22, 19 7:59 AM
Welcome to progress.
By tenn tom (259), remsenburg on Sep 22, 19 8:20 AM